Israel Iran Conflict.

CERG GROUP

CERG GROUP

Phone: 0417474916

Email: tony@cerggroup.com

www.cerggroup.com

Current Status on Iran Israel Conflict 18 June 2025

Current Status of the Conflict

The conflict between Iran and Israel has escalated dramatically in mid-2025, marking a significant turning point in their

historically adversarial relationship. Israel carried out a series of powerful airstrikes targeting Iranian military

infrastructure, nuclear facilities, and key personnel. This move represented a major strategic gamble and an open

challenge to Iran's regional influence and attempt to remove the Iranian regime from power.

In retaliation, Iran launched a coordinated barrage of missiles and drones targeting critical Israeli urban centres and

infrastructure. The response was unprecedented in scale and sophistication,

revealingIran’sgrowingmilitarycapabilitiesanditswillingnesstoconfront Israel directly.

Regional Responses and Power Alignments

Pakistan

Pakistan condemned Israel’s actions, calling them aggressive and destabilizing. Islamabad expressed strong political

support for Iran, framing the conflict as a violation of regional sovereignty. However, Pakistan remains cautious about

escalating its involvement due to potential repercussions from the U.S. and its fragile domestic security situation.

China

China is primarily concerned with protecting its energy interests, as it relies heavily on Iranian oil. While Beijing has not

taken overt military steps, it has positioned itself diplomatically in support of Iran and is quietly leveraging its global

influence to urge restraint. China also sees an opportunity to expand its strategic influence in the Middle East as U.S.

credibility is tested.

Russia

Russia views the conflict as a useful distraction from its own entanglements in Ukraine and Europe. Moscow may

increase its military and technological cooperation with Tehran, seeking to deepen its footprint in the Middle East

while challenging Western dominance in the region. Russia sees Iran as a valuable partner in a broader struggle against

NATO-aligned states.

United States

The U.S. has responded with a show of military force, deploying aircraft and naval assets to the region. The

administration is under pressure to support Israel while avoiding a wider war that could draw in multiple global actors.

U.S. policymakers are split between pushing for de-escalation and preparing for deeper involvement, especially if Iran

crosses certain red lines, such as attacks on American personnel or base.CERG GROUP

CERG GROUP

Phone: 0417474916

Email: tony@cerggroup.com

www.cerggroup.com

Potential Escalation Scenarios

1. Full-Scale Regional War

Proxy forces like Hezbollah, Syrian militias, or Houthis may become more active, escalating the conflict across multiple

borders. This could draw Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and possibly Saudi Arabia into a broader war.

2. Energy Crisis

Iran controls access to the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil trade. Any disruption would spike oil

prices dramatically, causing inflation and economic instability worldwide.

3. Nuclear Tensions

Continued Israeli attacks on Iranian nuclear sites might push Tehran to begin targeting of Israeli nuclear sites and

reactors

4. Proxy Expansion and Cyberwarfare

Both Iran and Israel possess significant cyber capabilities. The conflict could expand to attacks on infrastructure,

communications, and financial systems regionally and globally.

5. Depletion of Israeli Air Defence Missiles

Israel’s defence heavily relies on missile interception systems such as the Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Arrow

batteries. If the current barrage of Iranian missiles and drones continues unabated, Israel risks exhausting its stockpile

of interceptor missiles within weeks. This shortage would leave Israeli cities and military assets vulnerable to sustained

attacks, potentially causing high civilian casualties, infrastructure damage, and forcing Israel into urgent resupply

requests from the U.S. or emergency changes in military strategy, possibly escalating the conflict further.

6. Increased Involvement of Arab Nations

Rising tensions have stirred broader regional dynamics, prompting some Arab countries to reassess their stance. While

many Gulf states currently maintain a cautious approach, nations like Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and

Egypt might increase their involvement—whether through direct military support for proxy groups, providing

intelligence and logistics, or limited strikes against Iranian or allied forces. This escalation risks transforming the

conflict into a wider Sunni-Shia sectarian war, threatening the fragile balance in the Middle East and increasing the

likelihood of prolonged warfare.

Strategic Implications for Major Powers

United States risks being drawn into another prolonged Middle Eastern conflict while balancing global commitments in

Europe and the Indo-Pacific.CERG GROUP

CERG GROUP

Phone: 0417474916

Email: tony@cerggroup.com

www.cerggroup.com

Russia may increase arms supplies and military cooperation with Iran, further polarizing the region.

China is likely to deepen economic ties with Iran as a counterbalance to Western sanctions, while advocating

diplomatic solutions to protect trade routes and energy supplier

Pakistan may leverage the situation to enhance its regional influence but will tread carefully to avoid direct conflict

with Western powers.

Worst-Case Escalation Scenario

If the conflict spirals out of control, the consequences could be catastrophic:

1. Multi-Front Regional War

Iran fully mobilizes proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen; Saudi Arabia and Gulf states intervene; Israel launches

limited ground operations, expanding the battlefield drastically.

2. Direct Confrontation Between Global Powers

U.S. and Russia could face off indirectly or directly due to their backing of opposing sides, with China and Pakistan

complicating the geopolitical landscape further.

3. Nuclear Weaponization and Use

Under extreme pressure, Israel could deploy nuclear weapons, possibly prompting a retaliatory strike by Iranian allies

or other regional actors.

4. Global Economic and Humanitarian Catastrophe

Oil exports from key chokepoints would be severely disrupted, causing skyrocketing prices and triggering a global

recession. Massive refugee flows from conflict zones would overwhelm neighbouring countries and Europe, sparking

humanitarian crises.

5. Cyberwarfare and Infrastructure Collapse

Escalated cyberattacks could target vital infrastructure worldwide, spilling over into networks of the U.S., Russia, and

China, potentially igniting a new form of global conflict.

6. Collapse of Israeli Air Defences

A depletion of interceptor missiles could lead to a surge in successful Iranian missile strikes, overwhelming civilian and

military targets and forcing Israel into more drastic retaliatory measures or emergency military mobilization.CERG GROUP

CERG GROUP

Phone: 0417474916

Email: tony@cerggroup.com

www.cerggroup.com

7. Arab States’ Active Military Engagement

Full-scale involvement of Saudi Arabia and other Arab states could transform the conflict into a wider sectarian war,

multiplying fronts and dramatically increasing casualties and destruction.

Global and Economic Problems

The conflict threatens to disrupt the global economy on multiple fronts. The Strait of Hormuz alone handles

approximately one-fifth of the world’s oil supply; any interruption could trigger energy shortages, severe price hikes,

and inflationary pressures globally. This would exacerbate economic instability in already fragile economies, possibly

pushing some into recession.

Global trade routes passing through the Middle East may become unsafe, raising shipping costs and delaying supply

chains. These disruptions could affect industries worldwide, from manufacturing to food supply, increasing costs for

consumers everywhere.

Humanitarian consequences include vast displacement of populations, overwhelming aid organizations and

neighbouring countries. Refugee crises may destabilize regions far beyond the Middle East, fuelling political unrest and

increasing migration pressures worldwide.

Conclusion

The Iran-Israel conflict in 2025 has entered a perilous and volatile phase with an increased risk of rapid escalation.

Israel faces the alarming possibility of exhausting its critical air defence missile reserves, which would leave civilian

populations highly vulnerable to devastating attacks. This shortage could compel Israel to adopt more aggressive

military responses, significantly raising the risk of widespread casualties and destruction. Meanwhile, Iran shows no

signs of slowing its campaign and may soon deploy new and advanced weapon systems— potentially akin to the

Russian Oreshnik—which could alter the battlefield dynamics further.

At the same time, the risk of broader involvement by Arab states threatens to expand the conflict into a larger regional

war with deep sectarian undertones. These developments, compounded by the strategic interests and interventions of

major global powers, elevate the stakes to unprecedented levels.

Despite the intense military pressure, the likelihood of regime change in Iran remains minimal in the near term. The

current Iranian government maintains strong internal control through its security apparatus and popular nationalist

sentiment fuelled by foreign aggression. While prolonged conflict could increase internal strain, immediate collapse or

overthrow of the regime is unlikely.CERG GROUP

CERG GROUP

Phone: 0417474916

Email: tony@cerggroup.com

www.cerggroup.com

Previous
Previous

Bomb Damage Assessment. Israel Iran Conflict.

Next
Next

Situational Awareness